Why New Campaign Finance Laws Will Punish Free Speech, But Not Corruption by Michelle Malkin -- Capitalism Magazine
Capitalism Magazine > Politics > Lobbying  Newsletter | Feed | Support Us | Blog | Search


Why New Campaign Finance Laws Will Punish Free Speech, But Not Corruption

by Michelle Malkin  (March 14, 2002)

Newsflash: The woman who helped launder Al Gore's Buddhist temple money has not served a single day in jail. And she probably never will. The hidden story of how funny money honey Maria Hsia escaped any meaningful punishment for corrupting our election system shows just how empty all of this week's sound and fury over campaign finance reform really is.

In the spring of 2000, Hsia was convicted by a federal jury in Washington, D.C., of five felony counts related to more than $100,000 in illegal contributions to Democratic candidates. The stash included $65,000 in straw donations, which Hsia had funneled through clueless, non-English-speaking monks and nuns the day after Vice President Al Gore's 1996 visit to the Hsi Lai Buddhist Temple in Southern California. Hsia, a Taiwan-born immigration consultant, faced up to 25 years in prison for causing false statements about the pass-through contributions to be made in Federal Election Commission reports.

That was two years ago. Where is Hsia now?

Here's the rest of the story that the mainstream media has yet to report. On Feb. 6, U.S. District Court Judge Paul Friedman finally handed Hsia her sentence: a puny 90 days of home detention and three years of probation, along with a fine and assessment of $5,300.

Judge Friedman's slap on the wrist is no surprise. A Clinton appointee, he was assigned to the Hsia case by Norma Holloway Johnson -- another Clinton appointee who serves as the chief judge of the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. Johnson bypassed the court's usual computer-randomized assignment system and somehow miraculously ended up assigning fellow Clinton judicial appointees to oversee six criminal cases involving Democratic fund-raisers and Clinton crony Webster Hubbell.

When he first got the Hsia case, Judge Friedman immediately dismissed all but one felony count against the Clinton-Gore rainmaker. A higher appeals court overruled him. Then, during trial, he disallowed crucial grand-jury testimony to be introduced. After the jury reached its guilty verdict, he dallied before entering a judgment of conviction (which usually follows a verdict immediately). And according to the BNA Money & Politics Report, a D.C.-based daily newsletter that first reported news of Hsia's reduced sentence, Friedman blocked prosecutors from securing tougher penalties. In his ruling, Friedman suggested "that the prosecutors' position was improperly influenced by Hsia's refusal to cooperate with the Justice Department's campaign finance investigation."

It turns out that Hsia was brought before a federal grand jury in Los Angeles last April, after her conviction in Friedman's court. Government lawyers granted the convicted felon complete immunity and compelled her to testify about campaign finance matters, but she refused to cooperate and claimed not to understand English well enough to respond to questions.

One can hardly blame prosecutors for feeling like chumps. Ms. Hsia, a naturalized American citizen and savvy political operative, had no trouble expressing herself in English over the past decade while working with politicians from former California Lieutenant Governor Leo McCarthy to Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell to the Clinton-Gore White House. And she had no trouble mouthing off to New Yorker writer Jeffrey Toobin two years ago about how pleased Al Gore should be about his temple trips -- or about her innocence in the matter.

Gore, she said, "shouldn't feel embarrassed or ashamed of relating to the temple. He should feel very proud of himself ... There's nothing wrong. He didn't do anything wrong." Moreover, Hsia added, "I didn't do anything wrong. I'm at peace ... My heart is free." And so, while her lawyers prepare more delay tactics and appeals, is she.

During the 2000 presidential campaign, the Buddhist temple scandal was repeatedly invoked as a reason to support campaign finance reform. But the proposals by McCain & Feingold & Shays & Meehan would do nothing more to prevent politicians and fund-raisers from hustling cash from foreign nationals under the robes of monks and nuns in tax-exempt temples. It's already illegal. Piling on new laws while the old ones get broken with impunity is a pointless exercise in Beltway sanctimony. Campaign finance reform is a joke, and fund-raising criminals like Maria Hsia are getting the last laugh.


Malkin is a graduate of Oberlin College in Oberlin, Ohio. She lives with her husband in North Bethesda, MD.

Please contact your local newspaper editor if you want to read the MICHELLE MALKIN column in your hometwon paper.




 
Author Archives | Comment | Print | Email | Delicious | Digg | reddit | Facebook | StumbleUpon

Views expressed are author's and not necessarily CapMag's. Excerpts limited to 250 words, so long as a
hyperlink is provided to the original article. See our terms of use.

 

Capitalism Magazine Classics

"Francisco's Money Speech"

"So you think that money is the root of all evil?" said Francisco d'Anconia. "Have you ever asked what is the root of money?

End States That Sponsor Terrorism

Fifty years of increasing American appeasement in the Mideast have led to fifty years of increasing contempt in the Muslim world for the U.S. The climax was September 11, 2001.

Religion vs. Liberty
Secularism is not a sufficient condition for freedom--but a necessary one.

United Nations Declaration of Human Rights Destroys Individual Rights
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a charter of tyranny.

In Defense of the "Barbarous Relic"
Why The Enemies of Capitalism Smear The Gold Standard

Hatred of Western Civilization
Why Terrorists Attacked America

Repeal Sarbanes-Oxley
Treats Businessmen as Guilty Until Proven Innocent

Immigration and Individual Rights
Does a foreigner have a moral right to move to America? And should America welcome him?

A Tale of Two Novels
Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged Versus James Joyce's Ulysses

The New Right vs. Capitalism
The political right in America no longer stands for individual rights, limited government and capitalism.

The "Crony" in Russian "Capitalism" is Socialism
The fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 did not usher in capitalism. It merely replaced communism with socialism.

Israel Has A Moral Right To Its Life
Israel is America's frontline in the war on terrorism.

Moral Values Without Religion
The alternative to the dogmatism of the religious right and the emotionalism of the egalitarian left is a code of moral absolutes based on reason and individualism.

 

Related Articles on Lobbying:

Whose "Special Interests"?

Lobbying, Free Speech and The First Amendment

Attacking Lobbyists: The Real Problem is Government's Ability to Grant "Favors"

Limit Lobbying By Cutting Government

Campaign-Finance Reform Attacks Victims of Government Corruption

Campaign Finance Scapegoat: Proof of Washington Rot

Campaign Finance Limits Violate Free Speech

Portrait of the Greenspan Era

Money, Wealth, and the Corruption of Government

Campaign Finance Reform -- Needed or Needless?

Campaign Finances and Corruption

Campaign Finance Reform Diversions

"Campaign Finance Reform" Regulates Free Speech

Why New Campaign Finance Laws Will Punish Free Speech, But Not Corruption

Dissecting the Principles Underlying Campaign Finance Reform

More Articles on Lobbying

 

Copyright 2009-1997 Capitalism Magazine. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Terms of Use. Submissions