Capitalism Magazine > Media  Newsletter | Feed | Support Us | Blog | Search
  


Terrorism: The Second-Biggest Threat to America

by Carter Laren  (October 6, 2002)

Throughout the "war on terrorism," we have all heard our nation's leaders pay extensive lip service to "protecting America." But if "America" is just a collection of people on a slab of land somewhere, then there's no significant difference between the United States and Afghanistan (or Iraq), and there's no reason why one group of people should be protected over another.

The fact is, however, that America is not just a bunch of people on a slab of land. America is an idea. It is the idea of individual rights protected by a constitutional republic. Fundamentally, it is ideas that differentiate the United States from the Islamic dictatorships of the Middle East. Any defense of the US must be a defense of the ideas that make America possible, and these were conveniently delineated in the US Constitution over 200 years ago. The "war on terrorism" should not be viewed as a tribal feud between two fungible mobs. Rather, it is a war between capitalism and dictatorship; freedom and slavery; the Bill of Rights and Sharia law.

So is America defending herself effectively?

That is a question I asked myself a few weeks ago, and to find the answer I didn't need to look any further than Lake Placid, NY. While returning to Albany after a daytrip to the Adirondacks, I was stopped at a US border patrol checkpoint. An officer with a gun strapped to his hip asked me where I had been, what I was doing there, and where I was going. I told him that I objected to having to answer his questions, but that I would answer them out of fear of imprisonment. His canned response to my weak protest consisted of two words: "Border Patrol." That seemed to settle the issue for him, but it didn't settle it for me.

The officer did not search my car, but according to US Code, he could have. Title 8, section 1357 grants immigration officers something called "powers without warrant." The code explicitly gives them permission to board and search any "railway car, aircraft, conveyance, or vehicle."

So what's the big deal? The big deal is a little thing called the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution, which states:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

It is just a few words--a single sentence, in fact--but you won't find a sentence like it in all Islamic law. It's one of those essential ideas that make America possible and that Americans need to fight to protect. The Fourth Amendment was designed to stop border patrol officers on I-87 from searching my car. In fact, it requires that officers first obtain a warrant, and to do that it requires that they present (to a judge) evidence demonstrating that I have probably broken the law. In my case, I was over 50 miles from Canada, minding my own business. No warrant would have been granted. And yet, US Code explicitly allows officers to search my car. The US Code effectively negates the Fourth Amendment to the constitution "within a reasonable distance from any external boundary of the United States."

Unfortunately, this government-sponsored attack on America's foundation is not an isolated incident. In the post 9/11 hysteria--just when representatives should be rushing to the defense of American ideas--officials are clamoring for more and more anti-American policies. For example, under Operation TIPS (Terrorism Information and Prevention System), President Bush's Citizen Corps will recruit as many as 1 out of every 24 Americans to "use their common sense and knowledge of their work environment to identify suspicious or unusual activity." "Suspicious activity" is undefined; an oversight that McCarthy would no doubt have loved.

In the war against the United States, the Islamic militants are winning. They started winning as soon as Americans lost sight of the fact that America stands for something--that it's not just a collection of people, but that it is based on the moral principle of individual rights. That principle is what makes America worth defending, and to the extent that government officials undermine it, they are helping to destroy America, not protect it. Buildings are nothing compared to the ideas that make them possible. The real terrorists aren't in Afghanistan, or even Iraq. They're in Washington.

REFERENCES:

  • US CODE: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/8/1357.html
  • Oppressive Taliban laws http://usinfo.state.gov/regional/nea/iraq/offtxts/1026tlbn.htm http://www.cbc.ca/news/indepth/background/taliban.html
  • Iranian law: http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/world/iran.htm
  • Islamic law: http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/law/
  • Operation TIPS: http://www.citizencorps.gov/tips.html


Carter is a part-time free-lance writer and Producer Advocate. He is also a former editor and contributing writer at Capitalism Magazine, where he primarily focused on self-defense and national-defense issues. While at the University of Pittsburgh, Carter was a regular columnist for The Pitt News. In his spare time, Carter instructs both law enforcement and fellow citizens in the defensive use of firearms and is a student of the martial arts.




 
Author Archives | Comment | Print | Email | Delicious | Digg | reddit | Facebook | StumbleUpon

Views expressed are author's and not necessarily CapMag's. Excerpts limited to 250 words, so long as a
hyperlink is provided to the original article. See our terms of use.

 

Capitalism Magazine Classics

"Francisco's Money Speech"

"So you think that money is the root of all evil?" said Francisco d'Anconia. "Have you ever asked what is the root of money?

End States That Sponsor Terrorism

Fifty years of increasing American appeasement in the Mideast have led to fifty years of increasing contempt in the Muslim world for the U.S. The climax was September 11, 2001.

Religion vs. Liberty
Secularism is not a sufficient condition for freedom--but a necessary one.

United Nations Declaration of Human Rights Destroys Individual Rights
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a charter of tyranny.

In Defense of the "Barbarous Relic"
Why The Enemies of Capitalism Smear The Gold Standard

Hatred of Western Civilization
Why Terrorists Attacked America

Repeal Sarbanes-Oxley
Treats Businessmen as Guilty Until Proven Innocent

Immigration and Individual Rights
Does a foreigner have a moral right to move to America? And should America welcome him?

A Tale of Two Novels
Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged Versus James Joyce's Ulysses

The New Right vs. Capitalism
The political right in America no longer stands for individual rights, limited government and capitalism.

The "Crony" in Russian "Capitalism" is Socialism
The fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 did not usher in capitalism. It merely replaced communism with socialism.

Israel Has A Moral Right To Its Life
Israel is America's frontline in the war on terrorism.

Moral Values Without Religion
The alternative to the dogmatism of the religious right and the emotionalism of the egalitarian left is a code of moral absolutes based on reason and individualism.

 

Related Articles on Media:

The Mainstream Smearing of Ayn Rand

On The White House "Disinformation" Campaign

Obama's Assault on the Mind

Obama Broadcasting Corporation

This Is CNN: Abusing Copyright Law To End Embarrassment

Photographic Fraud

Anarchy on the Internet

Bad "News"

Should Heidi Moore Read Ayn Rand?

ABC's Shameful Global Warming Character Assassination

Global Smearing Courtesy of ABC "News"

Bad Times at The New York Times

The Media and Politics: Journalists Cannot Serve Two Masters

Worry About the Right Things

Cheap Shot Journalism

More Articles on Media

 

Copyright 2009-1997 Capitalism Magazine. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Terms of Use. Submissions