Honor Veterans, Rebuff Sacrifice by Wayne Dunn -- Capitalism Magazine
Capitalism Magazine > Culture > History  Newsletter | Feed | Support Us | Blog | Search


Honor Veterans, Rebuff Sacrifice

by Wayne Dunn  (November 10, 2002)

In Veterans' Day ceremonies throughout America, the word "sacrifice" will repeatedly be invoked to hail our heroes' finest actions.

While our veterans deserve the highest praise and deepest admiration, that term, however well-intentioned the sentiment may be, is simply innocently misused when describing the deeds of those who defend freedom. To illustrate how it might look to consistently accept sacrifice as an ideal, imagine receiving this letter regarding a loved-one in the military:

Dear Sir (Ma'am),

I am Johnny's commanding officer and I will soon lead him into combat. I just want to assure you that I am encouraging him and all my other men to selflessly sacrifice their lives on the battlefield.

My personal desire is to see that my soldiers return home alive. But I have sacrificed personal desires. Looking out for my troops is to my self-interest. But I have sacrificed my self-interest. Getting my men killed does not benefit me; I gain nothing from it. I have selflessly sacrificed such petty considerations as personal benefit and gain.

Are we not taught to love our enemies and turn the other cheek? Well, what better way to do that than to sacrifice our lives for the enemy's sake?

Make Johnny's funeral arrangements pronto.

Sacrificially yours,

Captain XXXXX

Now, you might be thinking, "I'm not for that kind of sacrifice!"

But what other kind is there? A sacrifice is surrendering something you value for something you value less or don't value at all-- the opposite of pursuing self-interest.

Imagine applying that standard, say, to the choice of saving either your child or Osama bin Laden. What would it mean here to sacrifice? Well, your self-interest is to save your loved-one-- you value him and not a mass murderer. A true sacrifice would be to save bin Laden and let your child die-- an act devoid of self-interest.

The same goes for other rational values, including freedom. It's to your self-interest to preserve liberty. A sacrifice would be to cheek-turn while you and the people you love are enslaved-- which is precisely what our brave veterans didn't do. They took up arms when the freedom they valued needed defending, and many paid a heavy price, some with their lives. We owe them our gratitude.

But self-sacrifice? That's our enemies' gig, not ours. The Germans who spawned Nazism, for example, held that the individual is merely an agent of sacrifice for the nation and the race. Hitler was the result. The Russians who swallowed communism accepted that the individual is nothing but a sacrificial lamb for the proletariat and the "greater good." Stalin was their prize. And today, Islamic fundamentalists preach that the individual is nothing more than a vessel of self-sacrifice for religious faith, for Allah. Tyrannies have been their reward.

Whether fascists, communists, and fanatic religionists, self-sacrifice is their common theme song.

But America was based on the enshrinement, not the sacrifice, of the individual. We sing a song of self-interest (though sometimes off key). Indeed, possessing the inalienable rights to one's own life, liberty and pursuit of happiness is simultaneously (but not coincidentally) the most selfish and the most sacrosanct American ideal-- an ideal that doesn't evaporate upon donning our nation's uniform.

As a former captain in the US Army, I can attest that I never encountered anyone who joined because of some masochistic yearning to transform himself into a sacrificial animal. To the contrary, our fighting men and women hold liberty in such high esteem that they are willingly to undergo some hardships, to potentially lose life and limb, to protect it. For such patriots, safeguarding freedom merits risking death, but death is not their goal. Literal sacrifice-- the shirking of a higher value for the sake of a lower one or of a non-value-- is nowhere on their agenda.

Our soldiers had much rather engage in selfish activity, like killing terrorists-- you know, those lovely darlings who do things like fly commercial airliners into buildings full of innocent people, sacrificing everyone's lives for Allah.

Triumphing in the war on terror requires that we be selfish. It requires pulling out all the stops. It requires that our political leaders be more concerned with preserving innocent Americans than with sacrificing our interests to preserve alleged innocents in terrorist nations, or with appeasing queasy "allies," or with kowtowing to the UN.

I can think of no better way of celebrating Veterans' Day and honoring our heroes than by committing to unequivocal victory.


Wayne Dunn writes about political and cultural events from an Objectivist perspective.




 
Author Archives | Comment | Print | Email | Delicious | Digg | reddit | Facebook | StumbleUpon

Views expressed are author's and not necessarily CapMag's. Excerpts limited to 250 words, so long as a
hyperlink is provided to the original article. See our terms of use.

 

Capitalism Magazine Classics

"Francisco's Money Speech"

"So you think that money is the root of all evil?" said Francisco d'Anconia. "Have you ever asked what is the root of money?

End States That Sponsor Terrorism

Fifty years of increasing American appeasement in the Mideast have led to fifty years of increasing contempt in the Muslim world for the U.S. The climax was September 11, 2001.

Religion vs. Liberty
Secularism is not a sufficient condition for freedom--but a necessary one.

United Nations Declaration of Human Rights Destroys Individual Rights
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a charter of tyranny.

In Defense of the "Barbarous Relic"
Why The Enemies of Capitalism Smear The Gold Standard

Hatred of Western Civilization
Why Terrorists Attacked America

Repeal Sarbanes-Oxley
Treats Businessmen as Guilty Until Proven Innocent

Immigration and Individual Rights
Does a foreigner have a moral right to move to America? And should America welcome him?

A Tale of Two Novels
Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged Versus James Joyce's Ulysses

The New Right vs. Capitalism
The political right in America no longer stands for individual rights, limited government and capitalism.

The "Crony" in Russian "Capitalism" is Socialism
The fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 did not usher in capitalism. It merely replaced communism with socialism.

Israel Has A Moral Right To Its Life
Israel is America's frontline in the war on terrorism.

Moral Values Without Religion
The alternative to the dogmatism of the religious right and the emotionalism of the egalitarian left is a code of moral absolutes based on reason and individualism.

 

Related Articles on History:

Elites and Tyrants: The Fruits of "Social Justice"

Some Thoughts on HBO's "John Adams"

Columbus Day: A Time to Celebrate

What is Fascism and Who is a Fascist?

The Legacy of 1968: Vietnam, Martin Luther King, and Campus Riots

Columbus Day Celebrates Western Civilization

Put the Independence Back in Independence Day

Jamestown: Birthplace of America's Distinctive, Secular Ideal

Constitution Day

Bully Boy Theodore "Teddy" Roosevelt

Notes on the Near Eastern Legacy of Islam

The Society for Military History: A Report from the Front

The Limitations of the Marxist Approach to Writing History: David R. Roediger's The Wages of Whiteness

Greek Honor: A Monumental Achievement

The Morality of Dropping the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki

More Articles on History

 

Copyright 2009-1997 Capitalism Magazine. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Terms of Use. Submissions