A Leftist "Indictment" of Communist Cuba by Mark Da Cunha -- Capitalism Magazine
Capitalism Magazine > World > Cuba  Newsletter | Feed | Support Us | Blog | Search


A Leftist "Indictment" of Communist Cuba

by Mark Da Cunha  (April 24, 2003)

In the opening few lines of Marc Cooper's editorial piece in the LA Weekly, he writes:

"Have you ever imagined what it would be like living in a society where, say, a John Ashcroft would be unrestrained by the niceties of constitutional law? Where draconian enforcement of a Patriot Act includes long prison terms for alleged thought crimes? Where, in the name of fighting "terrorism," nonviolent prisoners are summarily executed after being denied even the trappings of due process?"

Well, such a society does exist, the author is "sorry" to say. "Sorry," because that society is not based on American principles, but founded on the principles of the Left. That society is based on the anti-social principle: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." It holds that the purpose of government is to force men of ability to serve those without.

That society's name is Cuba.

Here is the reality of Cuba as stated from the horse's mouth:

Last Friday, three men were lined up at dawn and executed by a Cuban firing squad after being convicted of "grave acts of terrorism," according to a statement read on state television. Their executions came a mere nine days after they had surrendered in a failed attempt to hijack a Havana ferryboat to Florida. Their trial was, of course, secret. Even the Cuban state isn't shameless enough to open to public scrutiny such a degrading and chilling sham -- a capital trial that allows no serious defense. And both Cuba's Supreme Tribunal and its governing Council of State, headed by Fidel Castro, immediately rubber-stamped the death sentences. I suppose when you don't have a real trial, you don't need any real appeals. [1]

Cuba is a brazen example of the "successful" practice of Communism: the theory that the individual has no rights, and that all "rights" belong to the collective, or commune. However, it is not Cuba's communism, or Fidel Castro, that the author indicts; rather it is its naked depravity that he seeks to hide.

After recounting several more of the atrocities committed by the Castro regime, the author remarks that "some friends of mine urged me not to write this column, arguing that at a time when U.S. troops are occupying Iraq, this would only 'play into the hands of the right.' "

"Of course" Cooper argues, this is "ridiculous." In his view, there must be something outside of communism and that dictator (so loved by the likes of Oliver Stone, the cast of the Today show, and the Hollywood left) that is perverting Marx's perfect plan. [2] After all, communism and the principles underlying it are the Left's ideal. Ispso, facto, it must be good. So what is the source of that perversion? Cooper opines:

There are many enemies of freedom in the world, and -- no -- not all of them live in Washington. The actions taken by Fidel Castro this past month, precisely in this moment of American belligerence, are guaranteed to only please the ultraright. They help confirm my longtime suspicion that Castro lives in mortal fear that his most powerful tool of social control, the U.S. embargo, will one day be lifted. [3]

Here is revealed the real purpose of Cooper's piece: not to indict Castro's actions--but the alleged source of those actions. Ah yes, the reason why Castro is such a cruel dictator, the author would have us believe, is not because the "useful idiots" on the Left celebrate and morally sanction the thug Castro, or because communism is illogical in theory and a dismal failure in economic practice. Rather, according to the author, the evil of communist Cuba is due to a policy successfully used against the Apartheid collectivists in South Africa. That policy is the trade embargo supported by those "Patriot" types of the "ultraright" in semi-capitalist America.

Bear in mind that the United States of America is the only country in the region that has an embargo against Cuba--which the author clearly must know--and that Cuba is free to trade its products and services with any other country in the world. The average person, who assumes Mr. Cooper is honest, might wonder why he thinks that no country other than the United States has anything to offer or trade with Cuba.

The proper question to ask, however, is: Why does Cuba offer so few products or services for trade with other countries? The answer is because Cuba's economic system is socialist. There are no Michael Dells, Henry Fords, or Hank Reardons in Cuba. Those people would probably be jailed for committing "grave acts of terrorism."


Cartoon by Cox and Forkum.

As I wrote in "Isn't the U.S. embargo of Cuba the cause of Cuba's economic woes?":

As wealthy as Americans are, is the United States the only country in the world that has wealth? The fact is all the countries in Europe, South America, Asia, etc. have trade relations with Cuba. So the real question is: why isn't Cuba rich from its trade with all these other countries?

The reason why Cuba is so poor is that the right to life -- the moral-political basis of a free market -- and all the corollaries of that right (liberty, property, speech, etc.) do not legally exist in Cuba. In Cuba there is no private property, no private employers (the only employer is the state), and the only honest way to support oneself in Cuba is in the 'black market.'

Perhaps, the real reason that American Leftists want the U.S. to establish normal relations with Cuba is that once we do so, they can further bleed Americans taxpayers dry to support the Castro regime, as they do to support other bankrupt, socialist regimes in other countries.

To send money to Cuba will only further enrich Castro, as all foreign funds invested there do now (since foreign investors don't pay Cubans, but pay the Castro regime, from which the actual workers only receive a miniscule portion). It is the looters in these foreign countries, ready to "profit" from slave labor, that prop up and empower the Castro regime. It is they along with Dictator Fidel Castro who should be condemned.

The truth is--and you will not hear it from Cooper's dishonest piece--that Castro's most powerful tool is not the U.S. embargo as the Left insinuates. Castro's secret weapon is ideological: it is a moral whip provided by the "useful idiots" who repeat his propaganda against the embargo verbatim--as they dream of living in a society where, say, a Janet Reno would be unrestrained by the niceties of constitutional law? Where draconian enforcement of a Hate Crimes Act includes long prison terms for alleged thought crimes? Where, in the name of fighting poverty and monopolies businessmen are summarily imprisoned after being afforded the trappings of due process?

This is the reality of Communist Cuba--and if the Left are successful, such a nightmare scenario will become a reality in America.

References:

[1] AP reports on the UN reaction to all this:

"Cuba's foreign minister cried victory Friday after the U.N. Human Rights Commission voted against condemning his country's recent crackdown on dissidents....The top United Nation rights watchdog rejected a proposed resolution criticizing Cuba's recent moves against opponents, instead approving a milder resolution Thursday calling for a U.N. rights monitor to visit the island. "The unquestionable majority vote is a clear signal from the Human Rights Commission that Cuba has the right to apply its own laws," [Cuban Foreign Minister] Perez Roque told a news conference. "We express our profound satisfaction." Earlier this month, Cuban tribunals sentenced 75 dissidents to prison terms ranging from 6 to 28 years on charges they were mercenaries working with the American government to harm the island's socialist system...Perez Roque said his country would not comply with the milder resolution, which urged Cuba to accept a visit by U.N. human rights investigator, French jurist Christine Chanet.

The U.N. Inhuman Joke Commission would be more apropos.

[2] Mr. Stone... has called Mr. Castro "magnetic and charismatic." At the Sundance Film Festival, the 56-year-old director was quoted as saying, "I thought [Mr. Castro] was warm and bright. He's a very driven man, a very moral man." "I thought [Mr. Castro] was warm and bright. He's a very driven man, a very moral man."--New York Sun, 4/18/03

[3] Castro's opponents in the U.S. are "guaranteed to only please" his executions? This analogy does not hold as Castro's fiercest opponents in the U.S. are supporters of the embargo. They are also the ones working for freedom in Cuba. More than likely those killed and jailed are their brothers--if not in blood, at least in spirit.


Mr. Da Cunha writes for Capitalism Magazine.




 
Author Archives | Comment | Print | Email | Delicious | Digg | reddit | Facebook | StumbleUpon

Views expressed are author's and not necessarily CapMag's. Excerpts limited to 250 words, so long as a
hyperlink is provided to the original article. See our terms of use.

 

Capitalism Magazine Classics

"Francisco's Money Speech"

"So you think that money is the root of all evil?" said Francisco d'Anconia. "Have you ever asked what is the root of money?

End States That Sponsor Terrorism

Fifty years of increasing American appeasement in the Mideast have led to fifty years of increasing contempt in the Muslim world for the U.S. The climax was September 11, 2001.

Religion vs. Liberty
Secularism is not a sufficient condition for freedom--but a necessary one.

United Nations Declaration of Human Rights Destroys Individual Rights
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a charter of tyranny.

In Defense of the "Barbarous Relic"
Why The Enemies of Capitalism Smear The Gold Standard

Hatred of Western Civilization
Why Terrorists Attacked America

Repeal Sarbanes-Oxley
Treats Businessmen as Guilty Until Proven Innocent

Immigration and Individual Rights
Does a foreigner have a moral right to move to America? And should America welcome him?

A Tale of Two Novels
Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged Versus James Joyce's Ulysses

The New Right vs. Capitalism
The political right in America no longer stands for individual rights, limited government and capitalism.

The "Crony" in Russian "Capitalism" is Socialism
The fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 did not usher in capitalism. It merely replaced communism with socialism.

Israel Has A Moral Right To Its Life
Israel is America's frontline in the war on terrorism.

Moral Values Without Religion
The alternative to the dogmatism of the religious right and the emotionalism of the egalitarian left is a code of moral absolutes based on reason and individualism.

 

Related Articles on Cuba:

Castro's Cuba at Fifty: No Freedom, No Fish

Fidel Castro is a Communist

The Real Che Guevara

The Inside Scoop on the Che Guevara T-Shirt

Castro Spies on Jack Nicholson and Pope

Che the 'Guerrilla Fighter'

Che Guevara: Assassin and Bumbler

"Aid" from Self-Serving Autocrats

Europe's Appeasing of Castro Prolongs tyranny

Elian Gonzalez: The Day America Lost its Soul

The "Inspirational" Dictator and the New York Yankee

America Isn't Unilateral On Cuba Anymore

Fleeing Castro's Communist Paradise to Get to Evil Capitalist America

Unhappy Birthday and Merry Christmas, Elian

Lift the Cuban Travel Ban, Help the Dictator Castro

More Articles on Cuba

 

Copyright 2009-1997 Capitalism Magazine. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Terms of Use. Submissions