Republicans Ought to Recall Theocratic Principles, Not Gray Davis by Scott Holleran -- Capitalism Magazine
Capitalism Magazine > Politics > Elections  Newsletter | Feed | Support Us | Blog | Search


Republicans Ought to Recall Theocratic Principles, Not Gray Davis

by Scott Holleran  (July 29, 2003)

The nation's most frenzied electoral battle since the 2000 presidential election -- the effort to recall California Gov. Gray Davis -- offers dramatic evidence that the GOP is intellectually bankrupt.

The Republican philosophy was once represented by the late Arizona Sen. Barry Goldwater, who opposed Medicare, favored a woman's right to an abortion, and sanctioned a strong defense. Individual rights were implicit as the party's premise --- until the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980, when religion replaced individual rights as the guiding Republican philosophy.

To the extent Americans have resisted theocratic notions of government, the GOP's religious right domination is mixed with pragmatism, resulting in a Republican Party whose goal is a smaller welfare state under God. The arch proponent of this blend is the GOP's standard-bearer, faith-based President Bush, who is on the verge of signing the largest expansion of Medicare since it was enacted in 1965.

A rejection of Bush's compassionate conservatism nearly prevented the recall. Last year, Bush backed liberal Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan over conservative businessman Bill Simon in the GOP's gubernatorial primary. Republican voters overwhelmingly rejected Riordan in favor of Simon who, despite a 2-to-1 Democratic voter registration advantage, came within a narrow margin of defeating Davis.

The campaign to recall Davis was funded by GOP Rep. Darrell Issa, whose name will be on the recall ballot as a gubernatorial candidate on Oct. 7. Issa is known more for losing a U.S. Senate primary race than for his ideas. His congressional Web site boasts that he has pushed special programs for Medicare recipients with chronic illnesses --- hardly a landmark for capitalism.

Republicans considering a run include actor Arnold Schwarzenegger, whose sole political feat is a law that grants subsidies to public schools, Riordan, who endorsed Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein for reelection, and Simon. There are also the Huffingtons: Arianna, a conservative pundit turned Republican in Name Only whose ex-husband, Michael, lost a close Senate race to Feinstein, came out as gay and has filed papers to run for governor against his ex-wife.

If the GOP field sounds like a rerun of "Dynasty," it's because their campaigns appear to be more self-promotion than crusades on principle. Among their positions are regulation of free speech, higher tobacco taxes, and restrictions on private property. They aim to take down America's least popular governor by embracing the governor's Big Government philosophy.

Not one of the GOP's would-be candidates advocates individual rights and, therefore, no one offers California voters a real alternative to Davis, whose governorship is a disaster. His liberalism has caused one calamity after another: rolling blackouts, the nation's first attempt to prescribe which vehicle each person drives, outlawed washing machines and, of course, higher taxes. Californians deserve an antidote to Gray Davis; instead, they face a band of wannabes.

Contrary to Jefferson's contention that the best government is that which governs the least, today's Republicans increase public school subsidies and raise tobacco taxes. While Goldwater opposed Medicare, today's Republicans expand it. Republicans' only coherent notion, family values, is a euphemism for collectivism. Individual rights have no place in the Republican Party.

Goldwater's defiant cry that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice and moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue has been abandoned. Before the party that cheered Goldwater at the 1964 San Francisco convention recalls California's governor, the GOP must restore individual rights as their essential philosophical principle. Then, they will win elections -- or, in losing, they will at least have been right.


Scott Holleran is a writer and journalist. His articles have been published in the Philadelphia Inquirer, Los Angeles Times and Wall Street Journal. Visit his Web site at www.scottholleran.com




 
Author Archives | Comment | Print | Email | Delicious | Digg | reddit | Facebook | StumbleUpon

Views expressed are author's and not necessarily CapMag's. Excerpts limited to 250 words, so long as a
hyperlink is provided to the original article. See our terms of use.

 

Capitalism Magazine Classics

"Francisco's Money Speech"

"So you think that money is the root of all evil?" said Francisco d'Anconia. "Have you ever asked what is the root of money?

End States That Sponsor Terrorism

Fifty years of increasing American appeasement in the Mideast have led to fifty years of increasing contempt in the Muslim world for the U.S. The climax was September 11, 2001.

Religion vs. Liberty
Secularism is not a sufficient condition for freedom--but a necessary one.

United Nations Declaration of Human Rights Destroys Individual Rights
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a charter of tyranny.

In Defense of the "Barbarous Relic"
Why The Enemies of Capitalism Smear The Gold Standard

Hatred of Western Civilization
Why Terrorists Attacked America

Repeal Sarbanes-Oxley
Treats Businessmen as Guilty Until Proven Innocent

Immigration and Individual Rights
Does a foreigner have a moral right to move to America? And should America welcome him?

A Tale of Two Novels
Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged Versus James Joyce's Ulysses

The New Right vs. Capitalism
The political right in America no longer stands for individual rights, limited government and capitalism.

The "Crony" in Russian "Capitalism" is Socialism
The fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 did not usher in capitalism. It merely replaced communism with socialism.

Israel Has A Moral Right To Its Life
Israel is America's frontline in the war on terrorism.

Moral Values Without Religion
The alternative to the dogmatism of the religious right and the emotionalism of the egalitarian left is a code of moral absolutes based on reason and individualism.

 

Related Articles on Elections:

Capitalism vs the Welfare State: The Next Vote

Barack Obama: A Rookie President

An Inauguration of Tyranny: Barack Obama's in the White House

An Inauguration of Tyranny: Postscript

Political Speeches

A Mess of Pottage

Obama's Victory Speech

Why The Republicans Lost My Vote

The Conservative Package Deal

Why Conservatism Failed: The Anatomy of Compromise Revisited

Hosannas for Obama by The New York Times

Obama, Colin Powell and Popularity

A Perfect Storm

A Nation of Sacrificers: McCain's Love of What is Not America

True Believers in Obama

More Articles on Elections

 

Copyright 2009-1997 Capitalism Magazine. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Terms of Use. Submissions