Capitalism Magazine > Politics > Drugs  Newsletter | Feed | Support Us | Blog | Search
  


The Immorality of the "War on Drugs"

by Andrew Lewis  (October 4, 1999)

Much fuss has been made recently about George W. Bush's alleged drug usage. Apparently fearful of a scandal, Governor Bush has dodged the issue -- with disturbingly Presidential style -- creating a bigger scandal. Whether he has used drugs or not, he would have done better to follow the example of his New Mexican contemporary, Governor Gary E. Johnson. During his first campaign, Mr. Johnson admitted to collegiate use of marijuana and cocaine, before anyone asked him about it, thus exposing the "skeleton" in the closet before anyone even knew the closet existed. And he won the election.

More important, however, than Gov. Johnson's personal honesty, is his advocacy for a change in America's drug policy. Pointing to the failure of Drug Czar Barry McCaffrey's "war on drugs," Mr. Johnson advocates the decriminalization of drug usage, and even legalization so that drugs could be sold for profit.

Legalizing drugs would destroy the drug cartels and smuggling rings that invariably involve crimes of theft, assault and murder. This is true, but more importantly, legalizing drugs would be a step towards destroying the principle of government control over your personal life.

The use of drugs is not, properly, a crime. It is immoral and self-destructive, to be sure, but it violates no one's rights, and preventing it is not a proper government function -- which is solely to protect individual rights.

Furthermore, prosecuting drug users does nothing to cure the basic problem, which is philosophical: the user's desire to escape reality. The cure to drug abuse involves a rational education, a willingness to live in reality, and personal pride, elements that are conspicuously absent from today's schools and culture, and actively discouraged by a government that attempts to destroy individual responsibility at every level. The same politicians and intellectuals who claim that the individual citizen is incompetent to make decisions about drug use, also declare that the individual is incompetent to control his own investment, health care, and education. At every level, the principle of individual responsibility is being destroyed by the insulting paternalism and power-lust of our increasingly statist government. In this environment of insulting paternalism, it is little wonder that many people turn to drugs to escape a reality they are told they are not responsible for.

Those behind Governor Bush's evasiveness, and the so-called war on drugs, should look deeply into the lesson of Governor Johnson's acceptance of the principle of individual responsibility. Not only is it moral, but it works.


Andrew Lewis is a senior writer for the Ayn Rand Institute in Irvine, Calif. The Institute promotes the philosophy of Ayn Rand, author of Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead.




 
Author Archives | Comment | Print | Email | Delicious | Digg | reddit | Facebook | StumbleUpon

Views expressed are author's and not necessarily CapMag's. Excerpts limited to 250 words, so long as a
hyperlink is provided to the original article. See our terms of use.

 

Capitalism Magazine Classics

"Francisco's Money Speech"

"So you think that money is the root of all evil?" said Francisco d'Anconia. "Have you ever asked what is the root of money?

End States That Sponsor Terrorism

Fifty years of increasing American appeasement in the Mideast have led to fifty years of increasing contempt in the Muslim world for the U.S. The climax was September 11, 2001.

Religion vs. Liberty
Secularism is not a sufficient condition for freedom--but a necessary one.

United Nations Declaration of Human Rights Destroys Individual Rights
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a charter of tyranny.

In Defense of the "Barbarous Relic"
Why The Enemies of Capitalism Smear The Gold Standard

Hatred of Western Civilization
Why Terrorists Attacked America

Repeal Sarbanes-Oxley
Treats Businessmen as Guilty Until Proven Innocent

Immigration and Individual Rights
Does a foreigner have a moral right to move to America? And should America welcome him?

A Tale of Two Novels
Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged Versus James Joyce's Ulysses

The New Right vs. Capitalism
The political right in America no longer stands for individual rights, limited government and capitalism.

The "Crony" in Russian "Capitalism" is Socialism
The fall of the Soviet Union in 1991 did not usher in capitalism. It merely replaced communism with socialism.

Israel Has A Moral Right To Its Life
Israel is America's frontline in the war on terrorism.

Moral Values Without Religion
The alternative to the dogmatism of the religious right and the emotionalism of the egalitarian left is a code of moral absolutes based on reason and individualism.

 

Related Articles on Drugs:

No Drug Price Controls

Big, Big Government

Drug War Crimes: The Consequences of Prohibition

Criminalization Doesn't Curb Drug Use

Downey Supporters Only Half Right

Drugs and Politics: Prescription Drug Benefits for the Elderly

Hollywood: Another Casualty in the War on Drugs

America's State Sponsored Terrorists: The U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency

"Drug Money Supports Terrorism": Cigarette Taxes and Terrorism

Ayn Rand, Smoking, & Atlas Shrugged

The Immorality of the "War on Drugs"

More Articles on Drugs

 

Copyright 2009-1997 Capitalism Magazine. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Terms of Use. Submissions