Billion Euro Antitrust Fine Against Intel
by Raymond C. Niles
(June 22, 2009)
The Europeans Punish Success, Again
|
Punishing Google for Its Success
by Alex Epstein
(June 15, 2009)
Success earned in a free, competitive process is an achievement. Our Department of Justice regards it as a crime.
|
The Case Against Antitrust
by Raymond C. Niles
(March 1, 2009)
Antitrust punishes the best companies.
|
Free Google, Microsoft and Yahoo! From Antitrust Fascism
by Alex Epstein
(May 1, 2008)
A Microsoft-Yahoo! combination could not threaten competition. To the contrary, it would be an act of free competition, an ambitious attempt by two companies to improve their products by combining strengths.
|
Cable TV Competition
by Steve Buckstein
(November 6, 2007)
It's time for cable TV customers finally to reap the benefits of competition.
|
More Microsoft Antitrust Suit Insanity
by Nicholas Provenzo
(July 16, 2007)
Why would anyone even bother defend the rights of businessmen when the real money is made in looting them?
|
Laying the Foundation for an Antitrust Assault on Google
by Nicholas Provenzo
(May 1, 2007)
Just what kind of innovation does Pearlstein think will come when the super-productive and super-innovative realize that all their best efforts guarantee them is an antitrust suit?
|
Microsoft's Tacit Surrender to Antitrust
by Nicholas Provenzo
(July 13, 2006)
European Commission regulators argued that Microsoft's success--and its desire to add to that success--made it a coercive threat to its customers and rival firms under the antitrust laws, and they punished Microsoft accordingly.
|
Antitrust Incentives for Legalized Looting
by Nicholas Provenzo
(January 26, 2006)
Antirust law creates huge financial incentives--for the people who file antitrust suits.
|
Public Agencies Take Turn Suing Microsoft
by Nicholas Provenzo
(September 7, 2004)
Antitrust settlements are a lot like shark chum--they attract predators instead of staving them off.
|
| |
Recommended Reading: